Key Points
- Inadmissibility in Court:
- No Judicial Consideration: Judges will not consider the results of a lie detector test, regardless of the outcome.
- Not Helpful in Legal Proceedings: Even if a person passes the test, it does not serve as a legal defence, and if failed, it cannot be used against them in court.
- Police Use as an Investigative Tool:
- Getting Individuals to Talk: Police may use lie detector tests as a tool to elicit information or confessions from individuals. However, the results are not admissible in court.
- Cautionary Approach:
- Refusing Lie Detector Tests: Individuals are advised not to agree to take a lie detector test, especially if requested by the police or the Crown.
- Potential Manipulation: Police may use tactics such as falsely claiming failure of a lie detector test to induce nervousness, manipulate an accused to answer their questions, provide a statement, or confess to the crime, regardless of the actual results.
- Exceptional Circumstances:
- Rare Use in Defence Strategy: In very limited and rare situations, where the Crown considers withdrawing charges due to a weak case, a defence may use its own lie detector expert. The results may be presented to the Crown to emphasize that the accused is factually innocent, in addition to the Crown having a weak case.
- Cautious Approach to Silence Right:
- Exercising the Right to Remain Silent: Individuals have the right to remain silent and are not obliged to undergo a lie detector test.
Legal Advice
In any legal situation, it is essential to seek advice from a legal professional. The general consensus is to refrain from agreeing to a lie detector test, considering its inadmissibility in court and the potential risks associated with its use during police investigations.
For personalized legal advice and guidance, consult with our legal team for a free consultation to address specific concerns related to your case.
Video Transcription:
Contact Us
Complete the form below to get a free meeting and quote.